ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-5, 145-152, 2016
http://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/III-5/145/2016/
doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-III-5-145-2016
 
06 Jun 2016
A COMPARISON OF UAV AND TLS DATA FOR SOIL ROUGHNESS ASSESSMENT
M. Milenković, W. Karel, C. Ressl, and N. Pfeifer Dept. of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology, Gußhausstraße 27-29, 1040 Vienna, Austria
Keywords: Autocorrelation function, Correlation length, Power spectral density, Fractal dimension, Error propagation, Bundle adjustment Abstract. Soil roughness represents fine-scale surface geometry which figures in many geophysical models. While static photogrammetric techniques (terrestrial images and laser scanning) have been recently proposed as a new source for deriving roughness heights, there is still need to overcome acquisition scale and viewing geometry issues. By contrast to the static techniques, images taken from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) can maintain near-nadir looking geometry over scales of several agricultural fields. This paper presents a pilot study on high-resolution, soil roughness reconstruction and assessment from UAV images over an agricultural plot. As a reference method, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was applied on a 10 m x 1.5 m subplot. The UAV images were self-calibrated and oriented within a bundle adjustment, and processed further up to a dense-matched digital surface model (DSM). The analysis of the UAV- and TLS-DSMs were performed in the spatial domain based on the surface autocorrelation function and the correlation length, and in the frequency domain based on the roughness spectrum and the surface fractal dimension (spectral slope). The TLS- and UAV-DSM differences were found to be under ±1 cm, while the UAV DSM showed a systematic pattern below this scale, which was explained by weakly tied sub-blocks of the bundle block. The results also confirmed that the existing TLS methods leads to roughness assessment up to 5 mm resolution. However, for our UAV data, this was not possible to achieve, though it was shown that for spatial scales of 12 cm and larger, both methods appear to be usable. Additionally, this paper suggests a method to propagate measurement errors to the correlation length.
Conference paper (PDF, 8708 KB)


Citation: Milenković, M., Karel, W., Ressl, C., and Pfeifer, N.: A COMPARISON OF UAV AND TLS DATA FOR SOIL ROUGHNESS ASSESSMENT, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., III-5, 145-152, doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-III-5-145-2016, 2016.

BibTeX EndNote Reference Manager XML