ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Publications Copernicus
Articles | Volume II-5/W2
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., II-5/W2, 199–204, 2013
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., II-5/W2, 199–204, 2013

  16 Oct 2013

16 Oct 2013

Comparison of discrete and full-waveform ALS for dead wood detection

W. Mücke1, M. Hollaus1, N. Pfeifer1, A. Schroiff2, and B. Deák3,4 W. Mücke et al.
  • 1Vienna University of Technology, Research Groups Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna, Austria
  • 2YGGDRASIL Diemer, Dudenstraße 38, 10965 Berlin, Germany
  • 3Institute for Biosciences, Interdisciplinary Ecological Centre, Biology / Ecology Unit, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Str. 29, 09599 Freiberg, Germany
  • 4MTA-DE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Research Group, Egyetem tér 1., 4010 Debrecen, Hungary

Keywords: Forestry, LIDAR, Ecosystem, Inventory, Monitoring

Abstract. The amount of dead wood is a significant parameter for the description and assessment of forest habitat quality under the terms of the Habitats directive and Natura 2000 guidelines. EU member states are obliged by the Natura 2000 regulations to report on habitat quality in a regular interval of six years. To fulfil this task, the areas should be surveyed in the field, which requires an enormous amount of workload if done only by conventional field work. In this study the applicability of airborne laser scanning data as the single data source for the detection of downed trees in forest habitats is investigated. A focus is laid on the comparison of point clouds with only discrete (XYZ) and full-waveform (including echo width) information as input data. In our paper we present an automatic workflow which is able to detect downed trees with high completeness for both data sets (77.8% for discrete and 75.6% for full-waveform data). Due to large amount of false positives, the correctness using discrete ALS data is poorer (63.1%) than for full-waveform data (89.9%). It was found that the quality of the result is also influenced by factors such as dimension, state of decay, vegetation density and penetration of the foliage by the laser.